Over the past decade, we experienced significant growth and undertook source siting projects in various North American communities. While some sites have been developed with little or no controversy, others have been more contentious. We knew it was imperative to learn and understand the reasons behind certain concerns, identify how we could improve, and create a more consistent process to help us meet community expectations.
In 2008, we committed to working with stakeholders on a framework to more proactively manage our siting process and make our siting efforts more transparent. Read more about this goal.
We asked BSR to help us develop this new framework, drawing on its community engagement experience. BSR led us through a four-step process to evaluate our current approach, gather stakeholder feedback, and develop a framework to help us guide future siting projects. They conducted more than 60 interviews with internal and external stakeholders and visited key NWNA sites. As a result of this input, we established a new framework, which includes:
- National engagement to help us address regional and/or national issues often raised during conversations with potential host communities
- A set of articulated principles and specific commitments to help guide our conduct in local communities during the siting process
- An enhanced community assessment process to better understand the community at early stages of siting
- Tools to help our siting teams communicate effectively, including plans for outreach and dialogue that can be customized to the specific needs and expectations of each community
- A vision for how community engagement should be integrated into the siting process
|
Nestlé Waters North America and Nestlé Waters Canada operate in many different communities across the U.S. and in Canada, so it was challenging to develop a framework that would help ensure that communities are treated in a consistent manner, while also allowing for flexibility to help us determine the unique needs of each community. Every community will have differences, so we developed customizable tools as part of the framework. The form and frequency of community engagement will be determined with each community.
We will use the framework to guide engagement with every community where we seek to source spring water. We plan to incorporate the framework into training programs for appropriate employee groups and develop mechanisms for ongoing review of the framework.
Read more about the framework here.
|
 |
Case Study – Ruby Mountain Springs, Chaffee County, Colorado
In 2007, we began looking for a local spring source in Colorado for our Arrowhead® brand spring water. We identified Ruby Mountain Springs, in Chaffee County, as a potential source and began a three-year hydrogeologic and sustainability study. During this time, we met with businesses, community leaders, civic organizations, media, environmental groups, and the general public to get feedback on our siting project. Through this process, we learned that the community wanted us to keep trucks off rural county roads, maintain the rural character of the region, protect the springs, and contribute to the local economy and causes.
We made modifications to our project in response to input from community members. A longer pipeline route was obtained and the load station was located in a business area on a major highway. At the load station itself, the water storage silo was modified, the building design was changed, and the exterior of the building was modified. Around the springs site, which is preserved as open space, NWNA installed wildlife-friendly fencing. Construction of the Chaffee County facility was completed and operations began in July 2010.